Analisis Perbedaan Kadar Hematokrit dalam Sampel yang Dihomogenisasi Sekunder Sebanyak 8 Kali yang Tidak Dihomogenisasi Sekunder

Mustika Hutabarat

doi:10.30649/obj.v6i1.108

Authors

Mustika Hutabarat Universitas Katolik Musi Charitas

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30649/obj.v6i1.108

Keywords:

hematokrit, hematologi, Preanalitik, homogenisasi

Abstract

Background: Hematology examination is one of the activities in the clinical laboratory. Hematological examination is hematocrit examination. At hematocrit inspection one of the important things in the pre-analytical stage is the homogenization of samples. The delay in the examination that occurs causes the blood to settle therefore it is necessary to do secondary homogenization before the blood is examined using the tool. This study aims to see a difference in the results of hematocrit levels in samples that are not homogenized secondary and homogenized secondary 8 times. Method: This type of research is a pre-experiment using Static Group Comparation. The subject of this study was students of the Faculty of Health Sciences of Musi Charitas Catholic University who were selected in acidental sampling. The hematocrit level check in the sample uses the Sysmex XP-100 tool by using the Apature Impedance Counters method. . Samples were treated without secondary homogenization and homogenized 8 times. The sample measurement data was then tested using the Wilcoxon Sign Rank test with a 95% confidence level.Result: The sample examined as many as 30 samples had an average hematocrit level test result in samples given unhomogenized treatment was 65% and the average result of secondary homogenized sample examination was 8 times 39.9%. The results were statistically tested and showed a meaningful difference of p=0.000<0.05.Conclusion: There were differences in the results of hematocrit levels of samples that were not homogenized secondary and homogenized secondary 8 times.

References

Aipassa, Indah, Muji Rahayu, and Tulus Ariyadi. 2020. “PERBEDAAN KADAR UREUM SERUM DAN PLASMA LITHIUM.” 4: 42–46.

Alshaghdali, Khalid, Tessie Y Alcantara, Raja Rezgui, and Charlie P Cruz. 2019. “Indicators in a Hematology Laboratory.”

Dennis J, Ernst, Anne-Marie Martel, and Judy C.Aqbique. 2017. “Collection of Diagnostic Venous Blood Specimens.” CLSI 7.

Lima-oliveira, Gabriel et al. 2014. “Processing of Diagnostic Blood Specimens : Is It Really Necessary to Mix Primary Blood Tubes after Collection with Evacuated Tube System ?” 12(1).

Lippi, Giuseppe et al. 2007. “Evaluation of Different Mixing Procedures for K2 EDTA Primary Samples on Hematological Testing.” 38(12): 723–25.

Liswanti, Yane. 2014. “GAMBARAN LAJU ENDAP DARAH (METODE SEDIMAT) MENGGUNAKAN NATRIUM SITRAT 3,8% DAN EDTA YANG DI TAMBAH NaCl 0,85% Yane Liswanti ABSTRACK.” 12(1).

Putra, Gagah, and E Sri Sayekti. 2017. “Perbedaan Hasil Pemeriksaan Mikro Hematokrit Menggunakan EDTA 5% Dan 10%.” Jurnal Insan Cendekia 5(1): 2015–18.

Qurotul Aini Ramadhani, Ardiya Garini, Nurhayati, and Sri Hartini Harianja. 2019. “PERBEDAAN KADAR GLUKOSA DARAH SEWAKTU MENGGUNAKAN SERUM DAN PLASMA EDTA THE DIFFERENCE OF BLOOD GLUCOSE LEVEL USING EDTA SERUM AND PLASMA Qurotul Aini Nur Ramadhani , Ardiya Garini , Nurhayati , Sri Hartini Harianja Hasil : Hasil Penelitian Menunjukkan Ad.” Jurnal Kesehatan Poltekkes Palembang 14(2): 80–84.

Riyanto. 2014. “Validasi & Verifikasi Metode Uji.” Buku Validasi & Verifikasi Metoda Uji:Sesuai ISP/IEC 17025 Edisi 1.

Sebayang, Rosnita, Hotman Sinaga, and Mustika Sari Hutabarat. 2021. “HOMOGENISASI SEKUNDER TERHADAP KADAR HEMOGLOBIN.” Jurnal Keperawatan Silampari 5(DOI: https://doi.org/10.31539/jks.v5i1.3049 HOMOGENISASI): 444–52.

Vacutainer, BD. 2019. “Order of Draw for Multiple Tube Collections.” : 7417.

Yucel, Cigdem, Turan Turhan, and Esin Calci. 2016. “The Effect of Preanalytical Mechanical Mixing Time on Complete Blood Cell Count Parameters in the Emergency Laboratory The Effect of Preanalytical Mechanical Mixing Time on Complete Blood Cell Count Parameters in the Emergency Laboratory.” (December).